The art of seeing

Gianfranco Domenighetti_6

« Hi, dear Charles » …: he always started like this. The, we spoke. We often talked about the world, especially the world of health. “We are on board the Titanic”, he said, jus the way one confides someone a secret. “At this rate of growth, it cannot hold”. However, year after year, it went on holding. More and more, increasingly better, and… what happened after? Gianfranco Domenighetti, i.e. Dome, smiled. He thought that one day the masks would fall down.

 

We had been heads of the public health service, he in Ticino, me in the canton of Vaud, respectively.

 

We worked, launched projects, thought and laughed together. Our meetings were actually like parties. Officers? Just what we needed. Friends? Forever. It was time for all possibilities, for all fights. The health world was opening to new questions: its organization, its governance, its effectiveness; the usefulness of its services was gradually turning into a set of questions. We wanted to understand, read the reality behind appearances, perhaps ultimately change the sanitary order. We were young. It was the time of a kind of carefree and sceptical pragmatism. Not an activist, not a fighter, only a citizen. Lucid?

 

 

Life then separated us. I left elsewhere, while he stayed and went further and beautifully – in the only place where he could be himself: the university. The place where his glance could be exercised, become freer, deeper, more rigorous, and more universal.
Not far from photography and painting.

 

Actually, Dome was first of all a glance. A glance on things, on life, and on himself. The type of glance that allows us to recognize the facts lying behind opinions, to identify among the infinite mass of data, those that, more than any other and for a single moment, will tell the truth about the world. Such a glance results from doubt and benevolence. From doubt, because only doubt is able to create such radical dissatisfaction, this desire to go further and further in search of truths. From benevolence, because only benevolence is able to put doubt at the service of mankind. That glance, the scientist’s glance, was precisely what was needed to delve into the health reality, to analyze the facts, to make sense of the billions of decisions made by the multitude of caregivers, care recipients and health administrators at any moment.

 

There was a need for this this look, for the political glance to expose, behind the consensus and ready-made truths, the power relations and the interests of those who do business with disease, live on it or administer it. There was a need for this glance, for the humanist’s glance, to spot our contradictions and draw the energy of change out of it. There was a need for this glance, for the wise man’s glance, to comprehend, that is to say to “take ‘with’” [com- ‘together’ + prehendere ‘grasp’], to convince, that is to say “to overcome ‘with’” [con- ‘with’ + vincere ‘conquer’]. That glance was necessary to change our own glances. Dome was the bearer of those glances. Humour with the addition of kindness. Have I thanked him enough?

 

What about the photographer’s more intimate look, or the painter’s more secret one?

 

Here it is no longer a question of truth or lie, no longer question of power, of formal, statistical or experimental evidence. Evidence, the only thing that counts, lies in the strength of the artistic testimony and in the emotion or in the shock it arouses. No more rules, the only one that guides you is the one that the artist invents and gives birth to the form.

 

All you have to do is look. At another world, his, the one he offers us and is standing before us. We enter it slowly. It tells us something known that speaks to us about ourselves and, at the same time, something unspeakable, unknown, unexpected, which opens unsuspected horizons. Art, just as science, is a question of looks. Science, like art, teaches us to see. Dome, the secret man, the modest man, the paradoxical man; the anti-authoritarian supervisory officer who advocated for prevention while drinking whisky and smoking cigars; the cheerful and creative scientist who amused himself with variations of the consumption of care; the impatient Swiss, the fierce and critical native of Ticino; the sceptical citizen, the artist who had found a refuge in photography and painting, Dome went to look elsewhere. From there, he tells us: “Look, look well, look further and deeper. Everything lies in the art of seeing…”

 

 

Goodbye, dear Dome. Thank you.

Charles Kleiber, Lausanne, June 2018

Arch EPFL, former he has been Director of the public Health Department of the Canton Vaud, General Director of the University Hospitals of Lausanne (CHUV), State Secretary for Education and Research, President of the Board of Directors of the Hospital of Valais)

Gianfranco Domenighetti, 13.04.1942, aka DOME!
In an era in which almost everything is reducible to an algorithm, is it possible to define a person objectively?
A numerological algorithm would qualify him or her as 6 (aspirations) -4(achievements) -1(personality) -6(destiny) -7(quintessence). Those who have been lucky enough to meet him and to know him personally resort to more humanistic criteria in order to understand who is the person with whom they have been travelling a stage of their lives’ path.

 

DOME, like all of us human beings, necessarily had a memory of his past (a biological memory – hardware), as well as a conscious memory of the present (a cultural memory – software), but what distinguished him most was his ability to develop the “memory of the future” (a memory of what can exist outside the space-time dimension), a characteristic that is found above all in free, creative and anti-conformist spirits. DOME, as he liked to be called, had indeed a strong innovative and creative personality, endowed with courage and able to meet the most daring challenges: nevertheless, wehn it came to moving on to implementation, he applied a Cartesian work method, supported by non-negotiable rigour and an intellectual honesty. He was a true researcher who knew how to use the characteristics of his strong personality in a rational way: before expressing himself definitively, DOME investigated in depth, studied and tested every hypothesis of work and every new idea so as to be sure not to be mistaken, to make sure he was able to refute the inevitable criticism but, above all, to rely on the indispensable knowledge to convince and, consequently, to influence and modify the mental models of the people he addressed.

 

Despite being a number one, DOME felt satisfied when he managed to reach a goal, initially shared with a few close friends, after convincing his interlocutors that the “memory of the future” of which he was a messenger could be accepted as evidence. In fact, DOME was particularly gifted to create friendly personal relationships and to maintain a harmonious collaboration within his team.

 

DOME, a politician’s collaborator? DOME, an executive officer? I could have not found anything better during the eight years in the Council of State in the field that I had always had at heart: education and health promotion! I cannot give a rational explanation to the fact that we met in those years (1983-1991) and immediately established a complicity of intents: DOME perceived at once, despite our character and institutional differences, that we could “have fun” together imagining, with a creative and courageous (and sometimes even daring) approach, the future of the public health of Ticino and elsewhere.

 

DOME had understood that the insights and profound convictions in the health field that motivated us needed further investigation and scientific research, although at the same time he was persuaded that the results of the research had to be disseminated among the entire population through targeted campaigns with a view to provoking the deep changes desired in individual behaviours. Sensitization to arterial hypertension, fight against active smoking and protection from passive smoking, healthy eating, campaigns against sedentary lifestyle and in favour of movement, are some of the areas of intervention where the State dared to express recommendations, suggestions, reflections on individual health, starting from the assumption that in an advanced democracy every person should be able – thanks to their cultural knowledge and with the support of political institutions – to conquer and maintain their personal autonomy, which also includes the ability to adopt individual behaviours that promote the health preservation.

 

DOME played a central and decisive role in co-designing and scientifically motivating this “revolutionary” strategy of health education and promotion. He was a true officer, or rather, as the French say “un grand commis de l’État”, able to interpret in the best possible way the political guidelines governing health matters, to share them and to know how to effectively implement them, often in an unconventional way.

 

With DOME, no hierarchical relationship has ever been established, although he was perfectly aware of his function, which he carried out with great institutional loyalty.

 

With DOME, there was never a need for written or even oral instructions: our human relationship was based solely on intellectual complicity. What was decisive was his intelligence in understanding “l’esprit du temps” and his engagement to collaborate with enthusiasm and scientific rigour to implement what was conceived, with the conviction that the visions we shared foreshadowed “the memory of the future”.
DOME succeeded in doing this!

 

Rossano Bervini
State Councilor and Director of the Department of Social Affairs from 1983 to 1991

error: Content is protected !!